Custom database secrets engines
The interface for custom database plugins has changed in Vault 1.6. Vault will continue to recognize the now deprecated version of this interface for some time. If you are using a plugin with the deprecated interface, you should upgrade to the newest version. See Upgrading database plugins for more details.
Advanced topic! Plugin development is a highly advanced topic in Vault, and is not required knowledge for day-to-day usage. If you don't plan on writing any plugins, feel free to skip this section of the documentation.
The database secrets engine allows new functionality to be added through a plugin interface without needing to modify Vault's core code. This allows you write your own code to generate credentials in any database you wish. It also allows databases that require dynamically linked libraries to be used as plugins while keeping Vault itself statically linked.
Please read the Plugins internals docs for more information about the plugin system before getting started building your Database plugin.
Database plugins can be made to implement
plugin multiplexing
which allows a single plugin process to be used for multiple database
connections. To enable multiplexing, the plugin must be compiled with the
ServeMultiplex
function call from Vault's dbplugin
package.
Plugin interface
All plugins for the database secrets engine must implement the same interface. This interface
is found in sdk/database/dbplugin/v5/database.go
Each of the request and response objects can also be found in sdk/database/dbplugin/v5/database.go
.
In each of the requests, you will see at least 1 Statements
object (in UpdateUserRequest
they are in sub-fields). This object represents the set of commands to run for that particular
operation. For the NewUser
function, this is a set of commands to create the user (and often
set permissions for that user). These statements are from the following fields in the API:
API Argument | Request Object |
---|---|
creation_statements | NewUserRequest.Statements.Commands |
revocation_statements | DeleteUserRequest.Statements.Commands |
rollback_statements | NewUserRequest.RollbackStatements.Commands |
renew_statements | UpdateUserRequest.Expiration.Statements.Commands |
rotation_statements | UpdateUserRequest.Password.Statements.Commands |
root_rotation_statements | UpdateUserRequest.Password.Statements.Commands |
In many of the built-in plugins, they replace {{name}}
(or {{username}}
), {{password}}
,
and/or {{expiration}}
with the associated values. It is up to your plugin to perform these
string replacements. There is a helper function located in sdk/database/helper/dbutil
called QueryHelper
that assists in doing this string replacement. You are not required to
use it, but it will make your plugin's behavior consistent with the built-in plugins.
The InitializeRequest
object contains a map of keys to values. This data is what the
user specified as the configuration for the plugin. Your plugin should use this
data to make connections to the database. The response object contains a similar configuration
map. The response object should contain the configuration map that should be saved within Vault.
This allows the plugin to manipulate the configuration prior to saving it.
It is also passed a boolean value (InitializeRequest.VerifyConnection
) indicating if your
plugin should initialize a connection to the database during the Initialize
call. This
function is called when the configuration is written. This allows the user to know whether
the configuration is valid and able to connect to the database in question. If this is set to
false, no connection should be made during the Initialize
call, but subsequent calls to the
other functions will need to open a connection.
Serving a plugin
Serving a plugin with multiplexing
Plugin multiplexing requires github.com/hashicorp/vault/sdk v0.4.0
or above.
The plugin runs as a separate binary outside of Vault, so the plugin itself
will need a main
function. Use the ServeMultiplex
function within
sdk/database/dbplugin/v5
to serve your multiplexed plugin. You will also need
to pass some TLS configuration information that Vault uses when initializing
the plugin.
Below is an example setup:
Replacing MyDatabase
with the actual implementation of your database plugin.
Serving a plugin without multiplexing
Serving a plugin without multiplexing requires calling the Serve
function
from sdk/database/dbplugin/v5
to serve your plugin. You will also need to
pass some TLS configuration information that Vault uses when initializing the
plugin.
The setup is exactly the same as the multiplexed case above, except for the
Run
function:
Running your plugin
The above main package, once built, will supply you with a binary of your plugin. We also recommend if you are planning on distributing your plugin to build with gox for cross platform builds.
To use your plugin with the database secrets engine you need to place the binary in the plugin directory as specified in the plugin internals docs.
You should now be able to register your plugin into the vault catalog. To do this your token will need sudo permissions.
Now you should be able to configure your plugin like any other:
Upgrading database plugins to leverage plugin multiplexing
Background
Scaling many external plugins can become resource intensive. To address
performance problems with scaling external plugins, database plugins can be
made to implement plugin multiplexing
which allows a single plugin process to be used for multiple database
connections. To enable multiplexing, the plugin must be compiled with the
ServeMultiplex
function call from Vault's dbplugin
package.
Upgrading your database plugin to leverage plugin multiplexing
There is only one step required to upgrade from a non-multiplexed to a
multiplexed database plugin: Change the Serve
function call to ServeMultiplex
.
This will run the RPC server for the plugin just as before. However, the
ServeMultiplex
function takes the factory function directly as its argument.
This factory function is a function that returns an object that implements the
dbplugin.Database
interface.
When should plugin multiplexing be avoided?
Some use cases that should avoid plugin multiplexing might include:
- Plugin process level separation is required
- Avoiding restart across all mounts/database connections for a plugin type on crashes or plugin reload calls
Upgrading database plugins to the v5 interface
Background
In Vault 1.6, the database interface changed. The new version is referred to as version 5 and the previous version as version 4. This is due to prior versioning of the interface that was not explicitly exposed.
The new interface was introduced for several reasons:
- Password policies introduced in Vault 1.5 required that Vault be responsible for generating passwords. In the prior version, the database plugin was responsible for generating passwords. This prevented integration with password policies.
- Passwords needed to be generated by database plugins. This meant that plugin authors were responsible for generating secure passwords. This should be done with a helper function available within the Vault SDK, however there was nothing preventing an author from generating insecure passwords.
- There were a number of inconsistencies within the version 4 interface that made it
confusing for authors. For instance: passwords were handled in 3 different ways.
CreateUser
generated a password and returned it,SetCredentials
receives a password via a configuration struct and returns it, andRotateRootCredentials
generated a password and was expected to return an updated copy of its entire configuration with the new password. - The
SetCredentials
andRotateRootCredentials
used for static credential rotation, and rotating the root user's credentials respectively were essentially the same operation: change a user's password. The only practical difference was which user it was referring to. This was especially evident whenSetCredentials
was used when rotating root credentials (unless static credential rotation wasn't supported by the plugin in question). - The old interface included both
Init
andInitialize
adding to the confusion.
The new interface is roughly modeled after a gRPC interface. It has improved future compatibility by not requiring changes to the interface definition to add additional data in the requests or responses. It also simplifies the interface by merging several into a single function call.
Upgrading your custom database
Vault 1.6 supports both version 4 and version 5 database plugins. The support for version 4 plugins will be removed in a future release. Version 5 database plugins will not function with Vault prior to version 1.6. If you upgrade your database plugins, ensure that you are only using Vault 1.6 or later. To determine if a plugin is using version 4 or version 5, the following is a list of changes in no particular order that you can check against your plugin to determine the version:
- The import path for version 4 is
github.com/hashicorp/vault/sdk/database/dbplugin
whereas the import path for version 5 isgithub.com/hashicorp/vault/sdk/database/dbplugin/v5
- Version 4 has the following functions:
Initialize
,Init
,CreateUser
,RenewUser
,RevokeUser
,SetCredentials
,RotateRootCredentials
,Type
, andClose
. You can see the full function signatures insdk/database/dbplugin/plugin.go
. - Version 5 has the following functions:
Initialize
,NewUser
,UpdateUser
,DeleteUser
,Type
, andClose
. You can see the full function signatures insdk/database/dbplugin/v5/database.go
.
If you are using a version 4 custom database plugin, the following are basic instructions for upgrading to version 5.
In version 4, password generation was the responsibility of the plugin. This is no longer
the case with version 5. Vault is responsible for generating passwords and passing them to
the plugin via NewUserRequest.Password
and UpdateUserRequest.Password.NewPassword
.
- Change the import path from
github.com/hashicorp/vault/sdk/database/dbplugin
togithub.com/hashicorp/vault/sdk/database/dbplugin/v5
. The package name is the same, so any references todbplugin
can remain as long as those symbols exist within the new package (such as theServe
function). - An easy way to see what functions need to be implemented is to put the following as a
global variable within your package:
var _ dbplugin.Database = (*MyDatabase)(nil)
. This will fail to compile if theMyDatabase
type does not adhere to thedbplugin.Database
interface. - Replace
Init
andInitialize
with the newInitialize
function definition. The fields thatInit
was taking (config
andverifyConnection
) are now wrapped intoInitializeRequest
. The returnedmap[string]interface{}
object is now wrapped intoInitializeResponse
. OnlyInitialize
is needed to adhere to theDatabase
interface. - Update
CreateUser
toNewUser
. TheNewUserRequest
object contains the username and password of the user to be created. It also includes a list of statements for creating the user as well as several other fields that may or may not be applicable. Your custom plugin should use the password provided in the request, not generate one. If you generate a password instead, Vault will not know about it and will give the caller the wrong password. SetCredentials
,RotateRootCredentials
, andRenewUser
are combined intoUpdateUser
. The request object,UpdateUserRequest
contains three parts: the username to change, aChangePassword
and aChangeExpiration
object. When one of the objects is not nil, this indicates that particular field (password or expiration) needs to change. For instance, if theChangePassword
field is not-nil, the user's password should be changed. This is equivalent to callingSetCredentials
. If theChangeExpiration
field is not-nil, the user's expiration date should be changed. This is equivalent to callingRenewUser
. Many databases don't need to do anything with the updated expiration.- Update
RevokeUser
toDeleteUser
. This is the simplest change. The username to be deleted is enclosed in theDeleteUserRequest
object.