Refactoring
Note: Explicit refactoring declarations with moved
blocks is available in Terraform v1.1 and later. For earlier Terraform versions or for refactoring actions too complex to express as moved
blocks, you can
use the terraform state mv
CLI command
as a separate step.
In shared modules and long-lived configurations, you may eventually outgrow your initial module structure and resource names. For example, you might decide that what was previously one child module makes more sense as two separate modules and move a subset of the existing resources to the new one.
Terraform compares previous state with new configuration, correlating by each module or resource's unique address. Therefore by default Terraform understands moving or renaming an object as an intent to destroy the object at the old address and to create a new object at the new address.
When you add moved
blocks in your configuration to record where you've
historically moved or renamed an object, Terraform treats an existing object at
the old address as if it now belongs to the new address.
Hands On: Try the Use Configuration to Move Resources tutorial on HashiCorp Learn.
moved
Block Syntax
A moved
block expects no labels and contains only from
and to
arguments:
The example above records that the resource currently known as aws_instance.b
was known as aws_instance.a
in a previous version of this module.
Before creating a new plan for aws_instance.b
, Terraform first checks
whether there is an existing object for aws_instance.a
recorded in the state.
If there is an existing object, Terraform renames that object to
aws_instance.b
and then proceeds with creating a plan. The resulting plan is
as if the object had originally been created at aws_instance.b
, avoiding any
need to destroy it during apply.
The from
and to
addresses both use a special addressing syntax that allows
selecting modules, resources, and resources inside child modules. Below, we
describe several refactoring use-cases and the appropriate addressing syntax
for each situation.
- Renaming a Resource
- Enabling
count
orfor_each
For a Resource - Renaming a Module Call
- Enabling
count
orfor_each
For a Module Call - Splitting One Module into Multiple
- Removing
moved
blocks
Renaming a Resource
Consider this example module with a resource configuration:
Applying this configuration for the first time would cause Terraform to
create aws_instance.a[0]
and aws_instance.a[1]
.
If you later choose a different name for this resource, then you can change the
name label in the resource
block and record the old name inside a moved
block:
When creating the next plan for each configuration using this module, Terraform
treats any existing objects belonging to aws_instance.a
as if they had
been created for aws_instance.b
: aws_instance.a[0]
will be treated as
aws_instance.b[0]
, and aws_instance.a[1]
as aws_instance.b[1]
.
New instances of the module, which never had an
aws_instance.a
, will ignore the moved
block and propose to create
aws_instance.b[0]
and aws_instance.b[1]
as normal.
Both of the addresses in this example referred to a resource as a whole, and
so Terraform recognizes the move for all instances of the resource. That is,
it covers both aws_instance.a[0]
and aws_instance.a[1]
without the need
to identify each one separately.
Each resource type has a separate schema and so objects of different types
are not compatible. Therefore, although you can use moved
to change the name
of a resource, you cannot use moved
to change to a different resource type
or to change a managed resource (a resource
block) into a data resource
(a data
block).
Enabling count
or for_each
For a Resource
Consider this example module containing a single-instance resource:
Applying this configuration would lead to Terraform creating an object
bound to the address aws_instance.a
.
Later, you use for_each
with this
resource to systematically declare multiple instances. To preserve an object
that was previously associated with aws_instance.a
alone, you must add a
moved
block to specify which instance key the object will take in the new
configuration:
The above will keep Terraform from planning to destroy any existing object at
aws_instance.a
, treating that object instead as if it were originally
created as aws_instance.a["small"]
.
When at least one of the two addresses includes an instance key, like
["small"]
in the above example, Terraform understands both addresses as
referring to specific instances of a resource rather than the resource as a
whole. That means you can use moved
to switch between keys and to add and
remove keys as you switch between count
, for_each
, or neither.
The following are some other examples of valid moved
blocks that record
changes to resource instance keys in a similar way:
Note: When you add count
to an existing resource that didn't use it,
Terraform automatically proposes to move the original object to instance zero,
unless you write an moved
block explicitly mentioning that resource.
However, we recommend still writing out the corresponding moved
block
explicitly, to make the change clearer to future readers of the module.
Renaming a Module Call
You can rename a call to a module in a similar way as renaming a resource. Consider the following original module version:
When applying this configuration, Terraform would prefix the addresses for
any resources declared in this module with the module path module.a
.
For example, a resource aws_instance.example
would have the full address
module.a.aws_instance.example
.
If you later choose a better name for this module call, then you can change the
name label in the module
block and record the old name inside a moved
block:
When creating the next plan for each configuration using this module, Terraform
will treat any existing object addresses beginning with module.a
as if
they had instead been created in module.b
. module.a.aws_instance.example
would be treated as module.b.aws_instance.example
.
Both of the addresses in this example referred to a module call as a whole, and
so Terraform recognizes the move for all instances of the call. If this
module call used count
or for_each
then it would apply to all of the
instances, without the need to specify each one separately.
Enabling count
or for_each
For a Module Call
Consider this example of a single-instance module:
Applying this configuration would cause Terraform to create objects whose
addresses begin with module.a
.
In later module versions, you may need to use
count
with this resource to systematically
declare multiple instances. To preserve an object that was previously associated
with aws_instance.a
alone, you can add a moved
block to specify which
instance key that object will take in the new configuration:
The configuration above directs Terraform to treat all objects in module.a
as
if they were originally created in module.a[2]
. As a result, Terraform plans
to create new objects only for module.a[0]
and module.a[1]
.
When at least one of the two addresses includes an instance key, like
[2]
in the above example, Terraform will understand both addresses as
referring to specific instances of a module call rather than the module
call as a whole. That means you can use moved
to switch between keys and to
add and remove keys as you switch between count
, for_each
, or neither.
For more examples of recording moves associated with instances, refer to
the similar section
Enabling count
and for_each
For a Resource.
Splitting One Module into Multiple
As a module grows to support new requirements, it might eventually grow big enough to warrant splitting into two separate modules.
Consider this example module:
You can split this into two modules as follows:
aws_instance.a
now belongs to module "x".aws_instance.b
also belongs to module "x".aws_instance.c
belongs module "y".
To achieve this refactoring without replacing existing objects bound to the old resource addresses, you must:
- Write module "x", copying over the two resources it should contain.
- Write module "y", copying over the one resource it should contain.
- Edit the original module to no longer include any of these resources, and instead to contain only shim configuration to migrate existing users.
The new modules "x" and "y" should contain only resource
blocks:
The original module, now only a shim for backward-compatibility, calls the two new modules and indicates that the resources moved into them:
When an existing user of the original module upgrades to the new "shim"
version, Terraform notices these three moved
blocks and behaves
as if the objects associated with the three old resource addresses were
originally created inside the two new modules.
New users of this family of modules may use either the combined shim module or the two new modules separately. You may wish to communicate to your existing users that the old module is now deprecated and so they should use the two separate modules for any new needs.
The multi-module refactoring situation is unusual in that it violates the typical rule that a parent module sees its child module as a "closed box", unaware of exactly which resources are declared inside it. This compromise assumes that all three of these modules are maintained by the same people and distributed together in a single module package.
To reduce coupling
between separately-packaged modules, Terraform only allows declarations of
moves between modules in the same package. In other words, Terraform would
not have allowed moving into module.x
above if the source
address of
that call had not been a local path.
Terraform resolves module references in moved
blocks relative to the module
instance they are defined in. For example, if the original module above were
already a child module named module.original
, the reference to
module.x.aws_instance.a
would resolve as
module.original.module.x.aws_instance.a
. A module may only make moved
statements about its own objects and objects of its child modules.
If you need to refer to resources within a module that was called using
count
or for_each
meta-arguments, you must specify a specific instance
key to use in order to match with the new location of the resource
configuration:
Removing moved
Blocks
Over time, a long-lasting module may accumulate many moved
blocks.
Removing a moved
block is a generally breaking change because any configurations that refer to the old address will plan to delete that existing object instead of move it. We strongly recommend that you retain all historical moved
blocks from earlier versions of your modules to preserve the upgrade path for users of any previous version.
If you do decide to remove moved
blocks, proceed with caution. It can be safe to remove moved
blocks when you are maintaining private modules within an organization and you are certain that all users have successfully run terraform apply
with your new module version.
If you need to rename or move the same object twice, we recommend documenting the full history
using chained moved
blocks, where the new block refers to the existing block:
Recording a sequence of moves in this way allows for successful upgrades for
both configurations with objects at aws_instance.a
and configurations with
objects at aws_instance.b
. In both cases, Terraform treats the existing
object as if it had been originally created as aws_instance.c
.